Shift Of The Ages- David Wilcock.pdf

PROLOGUE: THE VOICE OF THE VISIONARIES

This new addition of 10/20/02 gives us an overview of the entire three-

volume series in the Convergence material.

PROLOGUE: THE VOICE OF THE VISIONARIES

It’s not as hopeless as you might think – in fact, it might just be perfect.

You are about to read an organized collection of thoughts that you may have

had at various times in your life, but perhaps could never quite fully integrate.

Chances are, you will also find many things in this book that you have never

seen before, and which will utterly dazzle you. Hence, you can step out of the

waiting room, as this next phase of your own personal initiation has just

begun. The scroll that is about to unfold before you will resonate deep within,

triggering ancient memories from before the time that you were born, giving

you the keys to regaining your own freedom in a world that is increasingly

becoming a perceptual prison of fear and anxiety.

We live in an age where tiny snippets of information perpetually rise and fall

in everyone’s life, blowing about with the futility of a rain of confetti – and

without the proper context to put them into a framework of some kind, they

are simply swept away on the winds of tomorrow. And then, if they are

remembered, the specific references are generally sacrificed to dim, murky

hearsay, through toxic words like “They” or “that study” or “I read,” which

then emerge as, “Did you hear about that study where they found that the

light speed barrier was broken? I read about it a while ago.” We have been

conditioned to automatically nod our heads in agreement when the almighty

“They” are invoked. “Oh wow… I didn’t know that they had done that!” Well,

who is “They?” What study? Read it where? This fast-and-loose information

game works temporarily with an open-minded person when hearing new

concepts similar to what we shall be presenting in this book series, but we

must remember that there is a far mightier “They” that has enslaved the

minds of most people – the consensus of mainstream thought. If you are

reading these words slowly enough, then you’ll probably end up thinking about

this concept, and how it has affected you and those around you, for days.

Which is good.

(Sometimes we will still need to use the word “they” to define a certain subset

of people, such as the alternative science community, or a particular group of

non-physical beings once named, or in discussing a particular study once the

names have been given. We will capitalize the word “They” and surround it

with quotation marks when using it in the context we have just mentioned.)

Ultimately, it appears that the subconscious gravitates towards the word

“They” as it is a soft, comfortable substitute for God; deep inside, every

person longs to be connected to the source of their being, and therefore

wishes to have a source of omniscience to draw from that he or she “knows is

right.” However, let us recognize the paradoxical mind-split that this situation

has created, once and for all. We ultimately want to use the word “They” to

invoke God’s presence, but since the Renaissance, science has boldly

attempted to remove God from all “rational thinking ” through Pierre Simon de

Laplace’s concept of “logical positivism.” This is how “They” of Science have

come to automatically assume that God is irrelevant to the quest for truth.

Scientists believe that this quest for truth is best accomplished by the

collection and synthesis of observable data , nothing more.

The collection and synthesis of things that we can study and measure is the

scientific process – and there is nothing intrinsically wrong with it. However,

the opinions of mainstream Science are not objective. “Science” is not a fair

game. Untold numbers of data points are rejected by nothing more than an

emotional decision that the data doesn’t “feel” right, with the belief in an

empty, Godless universe as the motivating backdrop. This is then further

bolstered by the heavy opposition of those who have strong media / political

influence and who would stand to lose all of their funding if their prized

theories turned out to be incorrect. Thus, planets are just “rocks in the sky”

that churn about in a purposeless idiot dance, in a Universe that is slowly

dying away by the “law of entropy,” eventually collapsing back into the

nothingness from which it is believed to have originated. Perhaps a wandering

space rock will happen to veer into Earth’s gravity and kill us all, since in this

Godless universe there is no “Scientific” reason to assume that we will be

protected. To suggest otherwise is to suddenly discover that you have

“stormed the machine-gun nest” of those who will accuse you being a

“ridiculous religious fundamentalist crackpot” with no respect for Science.

Hence, any invocation of the word “They” is almost entirely pointless when

you’re trying to tell another human being that almost every major aspect of

conventional scientific thought is either flawed or incomplete, from the tiniest

to the most massive levels of size, both organic and “inorganic,” and that a

hidden, grandiose model exists that can integrate everything into a fantastic

spiritual vision heretofore unimagined by most . The “scientific priesthood”

does not want to give up its quasi-Divine claim to the power of the word

“They”, but with the rise of the Internet, many people are beginning to open

their minds and open the books that might have otherwise just sat on the

shelf. So do try to remember the specific names of the people who made

important discoveries, as with that knowledge comes power – the power to

free the human mind from a subtle, unspoken and persistent despair.

Normal, clear, rational thinking is beginning to overtake the infantile desire to

blindly accept what “They” want you to think and believe about the Universe.

And generally, when the truth is presented in its purest form, it is not difficult

for a regular person to understand – they simply may never have thought of it

before.

Once we move out of the scientific arena into what Carl Sagan patronizingly

described as “the demon-haunted world,” we enter into a completely different

playing field with new rules. Many of these new rules are issued on-the-fly by

the continual rise and fall of those who claim to be “channeling” information

about how the concept of God integrates with our physical reality. A surprising

number of people will grab onto a certain set of teachings and will practically

fight you to the death if you are not willing to believe everything that their

chosen channel said. Hence, there is a new crop of folks in town who are

embittered by the old atheists, but end up repeating their same mistakes in

the desire to harness the Hammer of the Gods and wield the almighty power

of the word “They.” Everyone seems to want to be the Messiah these days,

and claim an exclusive gateway to the truth that only “They” can provide.

I do believe that intuition and higher consciousness have a valuable place in

the research process, but to say that you simply “channeled” a major chunk

of new, otherwise unverifiable specific information is, to me, a distracting

shortcut to doing this research “homework.” Specific information is not the

main purpose of channeling, as I understand it. The spiritual sources I have

studied with tell us that all research, all science is ultimately of small

importance, and eventually falls away as we move farther and farther along

on the path to true Oneness.

What does matter the most is the general material that can help us in the

evolution of mind, body and spirit.

I have no objections to the channels who focus on this type of material. Every

person has a unique and precious gift to give in helping all of us evolve – and

you give them a microphone and some freedom from fear, and if they are

honest enough, they can move the entire room to tears. Too often this only

happens at funerals, if a bereaved family member decides to speak. Perhaps

for the first time they are truly feeling the gifts of God that were reflected

through that person, and are more honest about their own feelings of

separation from God than they ever normally allow themselves to be. (Most

people do not realize this as the true source of their pain.) Actors who can cry

on demand in front of a camera and can bring this same response out of us

are seen to be dazzling. We know when they are faking or not, and often the

movies where it is clearly real will enjoy great success. At the time of this

writing, “Spider Man” is the best-selling movie of all time – and when his

father died and you saw that scared little boy crying close-up, you either

melted into it and totally identified with his character or you had to force that

clamp down on your heart once more and drive away the pain. The

authenticity of Tobey Maguire’s tears made that scene far more than a typical

“Hollywood death” – as suddenly it became our father down there, and we

were the ones longing for his loving presence to return.

Some information can dry our tears, make us feel whole, and renew the

sense that we are One. Most of this philosophical information can never be

“proven” and does not involve specific “facts,” but simply appeals to a

philosophical sense of reason, wisdom and loving-kindness. This type of

material does not require any outside references or validation – it just speaks

to the timeless self within all of us, and thus is definitely not “scientific.”

Specific information can easily draw us away from our own spiritual path if it

invokes fear or does not ultimately relate to our own evolution as conscious

beings who are One. Even if we could prove that we’re all going to die

tomorrow, next week, next month or next year, knowing that will do nothing

to help us grow and evolve today. And if our body drops, there it will lie. We

will still be ourselves, wondering what just happened to us as we look down at

it, and where to go next. What matters most is love and wisdom, female and

male, meshing together into the Unity of compassionate wisdom and the

sacramental nature of all things. And ultimately, I must admit that even the

concept of a dimensional shift in our imminent future matters little, as the true

work to be done is inside of ourselves.

A strict reading of “ The Law of One ” would say that most specific information

is “transient,” meaning that it is of little importance. However, certain concepts

of cosmology and physics were answered in quite exquisite and revealing

detail. So in this case, it appears that we are being told that it is important for

us to remember if the concepts of “reality” that are automatically believed in

the mainstream are really truthful or not. What do you think about when you

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika: